Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Mono Black Demons | wesley brito | 7-2 | None |
Dimir Midrange | francesco fiorenzoni | 6-2 | None |
Mono Black Demons | giordano distefano | 7-7 | None |
Abzan Pixie , Abzan Roots , Dimir Midrange , Esper Pixie , Golgari Midrange , Mono Black Demons , Orzhov Pixie
March of Wretched Sorrow ranks #450 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 9%).
Black average: 49.9%
Performance compared to other Black cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, March of Wretched Sorrow is a very strong card that performs well in most contexts.
Recommended number of copies: 4
Performance Efficiency: 12.92 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.4%. March of Wretched Sorrow has a win rate of 61.4%, making it 29.5% better than other 1-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Grief | Creature — Elemental Incarnation | 5 | 66.8% | 1 |
The Cruelty of Gix | Enchantment — Saga | 5 | 60.6% | 0 |
Cut Down | Instant | 9 | 59.6% | 0 |
Thoughtseize | Sorcery | 12 | 56.5% | 2 |
Inquisition of Kozilek | Sorcery | 10 | 55.9% | 2 |
Fatal Push | Instant | 12 | 54.5% | 2 |
Sheoldred, the Apocalypse | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Praetor | 14 | 53.5% | 1 |
The Celestus | Legendary Artifact | 8 | 53.4% | 0 |
Liliana of the Veil | Legendary Planeswalker — Liliana | 12 | 53.3% | 1 |
Hero's Downfall | Instant | 6 | 52.1% | 0 |
Cards that perform better with March of Wretched Sorrow than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cut Down | Instant | 1 | 7 | 71.4% | 57.9% | +13.6% |
Fatal Push | Instant | 1 | 8 | 70.0% | 57.6% | +12.4% |
Cling to Dust | Instant | 1 | 5 | 70.4% | 58.1% | +12.2% |
Sheoldred, the Apocalypse | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Praetor | 4 | 9 | 70.3% | 58.5% | +11.8% |
Thoughtseize | Sorcery | 1 | 8 | 68.3% | 57.5% | +10.8% |
Inquisition of Kozilek | Sorcery | 1 | 7 | 68.6% | 58.9% | +9.6% |
Liliana of the Veil | Legendary Planeswalker — Liliana | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 57.2% | +9.5% |
Graveyard Trespasser | Creature — Human Werewolf | 3 | 6 | 64.7% | 57.6% | +7.1% |
Duress | Sorcery | 1 | 8 | 64.3% | 58.6% | +5.6% |
Orcish Bowmasters | Creature — Orc Archer | 2 | 5 | 60.7% | 58.0% | +2.8% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Dimir Midrange | 11 | 0.5% | 43.7% |
Mono Black Demons | 11 | 5.8% | 55.6% |
Esper Pixie | 3 | 0.2% | 8.3% |
Golgari Midrange | 2 | 0.2% | 43.8% |
Abzan Pixie | 1 | 2.6% | 0.0% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.